Evaluation three methods of the extraction and purification of bacterial DNA of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria

Authors

  • Hannaa Farhan Abbas Department of Biology, College of Science, Al- Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq Author
    • Ibtisam Hammood Naser AL Musawi Department of Biology, College of Science, Al- Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq. Author

      Keywords:

      DNA extraction, Gram positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria.

      Abstract

      Three methods were evaluated to choose the rapid and simple method of DNA extraction that is suitable for PCR detection. Ten isolates of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria (Bacillus subtilisStaphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes, S. pneumonia: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhi, S. typhimurium and Proteus mirabilis). Gram positive bacteria were more resistant to cellular lyses due to high concentration of peptidoglycan within bacterial cell wall. The qualitative assessment of bacterial DNA revealed that DNA extraction with QuickExtract™ Bacterial DNA Extraction Kit method produced the highest DNA purity and highest DNA yield as compared with the other two methods. In conclusion, QuickExtract™ Bacterial DNA extraction kit method is technically simpler and more rapid than Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit and phenol- chloroform method which was more slow and low purity of yielded DNA. QuickExtract™ Bacterial DNA extraction kit is the best method for extracting genomic DNA from Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, providing single-tube system. No toxic organic solvents, suitable for high-throughput applications, ready Lyse™ Lysozyme supplied and long DNA generated.

       

      Downloads

      Published

      2016-03-04

      Issue

      Section

      Research article

      How to Cite

      [1]
      Hannaa Farhan Abbas and Ibtisam Hammood Naser AL Musawi trans. 2016. Evaluation three methods of the extraction and purification of bacterial DNA of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. World Journal of Experimental Biosciences. 4, 1 (Mar. 2016), 62–65.

      Most read articles by the same author(s)