World Journal of Experimental Biosciences
Volume 14, Number 1: 45–51
P-ISSN: 2313-3937  |  e-ISSN: 3070-0647
2026
Research Article

Comparative Virulence and Cytopathic Profiles of Sabin Poliovirus Vaccine Strains and Acute Flaccid Paralysis-Associated Isolates from Iraqi Children

Razaq Hadi Eissa Al-Garawi1, Ayaid Khadem Zgair2*

Abstract

The use of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), which consists of attenuated Sabin strains, is a key component to achieving worldwide poliovirus eradication. However, many people view vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) and vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPV) as significant problems, particularly in regions with low sanitation and vaccine coverage rates. This study describes a comparison of virulence and cytopathic effects of OPV and AFP-associated Sabin isolates obtained from Iraqi children. A total of 250 fecal samples obtained from suspected AFP cases and 50 from healthy controls were screened for the presence of poliovirus. Viral isolation was performed using RD and L20B cell lines and serotyping was performed using neutralization testing. The cytopathic effects (CPE) and viral titer (TCID₅₀) values were compared to those of OPV and AFP-associated isolates. Poliovirus (Sabin, not wild type) was isolated from 35 of the 105 (33.33%) suspected AFP cases and 3 out of the 13 (23%) control subjects. Sabin type 3 predominated (51.42%), followed by mixed type 1+3 (28.57%) and type 1 (20%), with no type 2 isolates detected. Notably, AFP-associated isolates demonstrated significantly higher viral titers than the original vaccine strains, and distinctive cytopathic patterns characterized by rapid, complete monolayer destruction within 1–2 days, in contrast to the slower, focal degeneration observed with vaccine strains. The present study reported increased cytopathic characteristics in AFP-associated Sabin isolates compared with vaccine strains. These findings emphasize the importance of continuous virological surveillance and support the strategic transition toward inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV).

Keywords: Acute flaccid paralysis, Cytopathic effects, Oral polio vaccine, Poliovirus, Vaccine-derived poliovirus, Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP).

Citation: Al-Garawi RHE, Zgair AK. (2026) Comparative Virulence and Cytopathic Profiles of Sabin Poliovirus Vaccine Strains and Acute Flaccid Paralysis-Associated Isolates from Iraqi Children. World J Exp Biosci 14:45–51. doi: 10.65329/wjeb.v14.01.08.

Received April 28, 2026  |  Revised June 2, 2026  |  Accepted June 19, 2026  |  Published June 28, 2026

DOI: 10.65329/wjeb.v14.01.08 Volume: 14  |  Pages: 45–51 Published: June 28, 2026 Correspondence: ayaid.zgair@sc.uobaghdad.edu.iq

1. Introduction

Polio is a disease that results from the poliovirus (an enterovirus). There was a time when poliovirus was causing great expense and sickness in people all over [1]. The Global Eradication Initiative was first created in 1988 to address this issue, and through GPEI, wild-type poliovirus (WPV) incidence dropped from approximately 350,000 cases a year to less than 1,000 cases in endemic areas [2]. After the end of the WPV era, the number of cases of vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) are being seen, especially in low-income countries with poor sanitation facilities and limited vaccine coverage [3,4]. The oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has played a critical role in the prevention and eradication of poliomyelitis, due to the fact that OPV contains three different attenuated Sabin strains of the poliovirus (PV1, PV2, and PV3) [5]. Because OPV strains of poliovirus are attenuated, individuals vaccinated with OPV have been provided with intestinal immunity and there has been a reduction in the neurovirulence of the attenuated strains. However, replication of the OPV in certain individuals (particularly those with weakened immune systems) may reverse the attenuation of the OPV and become virulent and neurovirulent; thus presenting a significant public health concern [6]. In contrast to IPV, which cannot revert to a neurovirulent strain, OPV may contain virulent and neurovirulent strains due to spontaneous mutations occurring during viral replication [7].

Around 1 in every 2.4–3 million dosages of oral polio vaccine (OPV) that are given out all around the world will result in vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). People who receive the vaccine and their close contacts can get infected through the fecal-oral route [8]. Infections from the vaccine-associated virus will be more likely to occur among people who are seriously immunocompromised or those with primary immunodeficiencies, as well as the immunosuppressed [9]. Vaccines that are derived from the oral vaccine can become reversionally virulent and spread through faeces to others that have not received a vaccine, in low vaccination coverage communities [10].

The virulence of viral pathogenicity can be determined by in vitro markers such as cytopathic effect (CPE) in cell culture systems, as well as in virological measures of infection and replication rates (TCID₅₀) [11,12]. The marking characteristics of CPE include cellular rounding, detachment from the substrate or medium, and lysis. The extent and time course of CPE are correlated with viral pathogenicity and growth characteristics [13]. By comparing these parameters in viruses derived from the OPV and from currently circulating isolates of the same viral strain in linear time, it will be possible to gain insight into genetic changes that may have occurred and how they could impact virulence [14].

While VAPP and VDPV are both well-characterised, the ability to directly compare the in vitro virulence markers of the Sabin vaccine strain to current AFP-associated isolates from the same region has been restricted to only a few instances [15]. Because Iraq is in a state of transition away from the endemic wild-type poliovirus to an environment where, in the last year, no wild type of polioviruses was isolated in Iraq — that is because of the positive cooperation between the Ministry of Health, Iraq represented by central public health laboratories, department of virology and the World Health Organization (WHO) — which depends upon poliomyelitis surveillance, this investigation represents a unique chance to evaluate absolute characteristics of circulating Sabin vaccine viruses in Iraq and the potential public health consequences of these viruses [16]. This is the first systematic comparison of virulence between OPV strains and AFP-associated isolates conducted in the Middle East.

The objectives of the current study are: (i) to isolate and characterize poliovirus from fecal samples of children with AFP and healthy controls in Iraq; (ii) to serotype isolated Sabin polioviruses and determine their epidemiological distribution across Iraqi provinces; (iii) to compare cytopathic effects between original Sabin vaccine strains (OPV) and AFP-associated isolates in L20B cell culture; (iv) to quantify and compare viral titers (TCID₅₀) between vaccine strains and AFP-associated isolates; and (v) to discuss the implications of these findings for polio eradication strategy and vaccine policy in Iraq and the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Study Design and Sample Collection

This cross-sectional research was performed at the National Laboratory of Poliovirus in Baghdad, Iraq, in compliance with WHO standards for reporting on poliovirus surveillance. The research study plan was reviewed by the National Institute of Health, Iraq and received IRB approval (IRB approval number: NIH-IRQ-2012-001). Each child's parents or guardians provided informed consent prior to participation in this study.

Stool samples were collected from 250 children (aged 6 months to 15 years) presenting with acute flaccid paralysis between January 2016 and May 2018. AFP cases were defined according to WHO criteria: acute onset of flaccid paralysis in children under 15 years of age, or paralysis of any age when poliomyelitis is suspected. Fifty healthy control samples were collected. All samples were collected within 14 days of paralysis onset and transported to the laboratory within 48 h of collection in accordance with cold chain requirements. Fifty stool samples were collected from age-matched healthy children who had received routine OPV immunization as controls. These children showed no signs of AFP or other neurological symptoms and had completed their primary vaccination series according to the Iraqi national immunization schedule [17].

2.2 Cell Culture Systems

Two cell lines were used for viral isolation in accordance with WHO recommendations: RD cells (human rhabdomyosarcoma) and L20B cells (genetically modified mouse L cells expressing the human poliovirus receptor, CD155). RD cells were obtained from the WHO Regional Reference Laboratory and maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin). L20B cells were utilized as the gold standard for poliovirus detection due to their selective sensitivity to polioviruses while remaining resistant to most other enteroviruses. Cells were maintained at passage numbers below P35 for L20B and P245 for RD cells to ensure optimal sensitivity. Cell monolayers were grown to 80–90% before viral inoculation and maintained at 37°C ± 1°C in a 5% CO₂.

2.3 Viral Isolation and Identification

Stool samples obtained from patients were prepared utilizing standard operating procedures put forth by the World Health Organization (WHO). For this process, approximately 1–2 grams of stool were put into an inert medium (MEM, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with anti-bacterial (streptomycin–gentamycin, 100 U/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-fungal agents, at a ratio of 1:10. This amount would be further diluted during centrifugation (1,500 × g for 30 min at 4°C), and filtered through 0.22 μm single-use filters prior to storage at −70°C until use for inoculation. Cell monolayers were inoculated with 0.1 mL of the prepared stool suspension. Inoculated cultures were incubated at 36°C and monitored for daily cell roundings, detachments, and lysis (CPE) over a period of 5 days. Positive cultures exhibiting CPE consistent with enteroviral disease were sub-cultured to fresh cell monolayers (one passage). Those isolates that grew only in RD cells were considered NPEV, while those that grew in both RD and L20B cell lines were subjected to serotype identification of poliovirus [18–20].

2.4 Serotyping and Neutralization Assays

The microneutralization test for serotyping polioviruses was done in 96-well cultures containing tissue cells and RIVM anti-serum pools (from the National Institute of Public Health & Environment in the Netherlands). Test virus was diluted to contain chicken embryo (CE) ID₅₀ and mixed with equal amounts of anti-polio serum from each of the pools: pool 1 + pool 2 + pool 3 (negative controls), pool 1 + pool 2 (tests for PV3), pool 1 + pool 3 (tests for PV2), pool 2 + pool 3 (tests for PV1). Virus and anti-serum were incubated together for 60 min at 36°C to allow time for the antibodies to bind to the virus before L20B cells were added. The plates with L20B cells were incubated at 36°C and examined daily for the appearance of cytopathic effects (CPE). CPE was used to determine the poliovirus serotype from the antiserum that showed no CPE. All serotyping was repeated using separate preparations of the virus(s) [21].

2.5 Cytopathic Effect Analysis

The cytopathic effects of the original strains of vaccine (Sabin) and isolates associated with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) were systematically documented and compared. The cytopathic effects (CPE) were rated from 1+ (minimal cell rounding: less than 25% of monolayer), to 2+ (moderate CPE: affecting 25–50% of monolayer), to 3+ (extensive CPE: affecting 50–75% of monolayer), to 4+ (total destruction of monolayer: greater than 75% of monolayer). The CPE development rates were recorded and included the time until initial CPE, the rate of progression through CPE development, and the rate of progression to maximum CPE.

Metabolic characteristics of the infected cells were assessed using microscopic examinations at 100× and 400× magnification. The following morphological characteristics were assessed: cell rounding, cytoplasmic granulation, nuclear pyknosis, the rate of cell detachment, and pattern of spread of cytopathic effect (focal or diffuse). Digital photomicrographs were obtained using a Sony digital camera system mounted to an Olympus inverted microscope [22,23].

2.6 Viral Titer Determination

The tissue culture infectious dose 50% (TCID₅₀) of the virus was determined using the Reed-Muench equation, which uses serial ten-fold dilutions of the virus then inoculating the dilutions onto L20B cell monolayers in 96-well plates. A total of four wells were inoculated for each dilution; the plates were then incubated at 36°C for one week (7 days) and observed daily for any cytopathic effects (CPE). The formula was used as follows:

Log TCID₅₀ = L − d(S − 0.5)

where L = log of the lowest dilution tested (i.e., the dilution of 10−3), d = difference between the log dilution steps, S = sum of the positive wells in the entire experiment. The TCID₅₀ value will be expressed as log₁₀ TCID₅₀ per 50 μl. Titer determinations were performed in duplicate and confirmed by repeat measurements [24].

2.7 Statistical Analysis

TCID₅₀ values were log-transformed and compared between vaccine strains and AFP-associated isolates using appropriate statistical tests. Proportional differences in isolation rates between AFP and control groups were assessed using chi-square tests. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 Poliovirus Isolation and Detection

During the period extending from January 2012 to December 2016, a total of 250 stool specimens were collected from children with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) throughout Iraq. Screening specimens for cytopathic effect (CPE) using RD cells revealed that 42% (105) of the specimens had evidence of active enterovirus infection. Using L20B cells for poliovirus-specific identification, the presence of poliovirus was confirmed in 35 samples (33.3% of RD-positive samples, 14% of total AFP). Among age-matched asymptomatic controls who had completed primary immunization with OPV, 26% (13 samples) had CPE when evaluated with RD cells, 23% (3 samples) of which were confirmed via L20B. The poliovirus prevalence rates in the control population (6%) relative to that of children with AFP (14%) are consistent with the expected epidemiological trends reported in other epidemiologic surveys. Non-polio enteroviruses (NPEVs) account for a total of 70/250 (28%) of samples obtained from children with AFP and 10/50 (20%) of samples from control children, indicating significant ongoing circulation of enteroviruses unrelated to polioviruses.

3.2 Serotype Distribution and Epidemiological Characterization

Poliovirus serotyping via microneutralization assay revealed a striking predominance of Sabin PV-3, absent PV-2 isolates, and limited PV-1 representation among AFP-associated isolates.

Table 1. Distribution of Sabin poliovirus serotypes (PV-1, PV-2, PV-3, and mixed PV-1+3) detected among AFP-associated isolates and healthy control groups.

Serotype AFP Cases (n) Control Group (n) Total Prevalence (%)
Sabin PV-1 7 1 20.0
Sabin PV-3 18 2 51.4
Mixed PV-1+3 10 0 28.6
PV-2 0 0 0

Serotypes were determined by microneutralization assay using type-specific antisera. No Sabin PV-2 was detected in either group, consistent with the global transition to bivalent OPV formulations post-1999.

3.3 Geographic Distribution of Isolates

Poliovirus detection showed geographic heterogeneity among Iraqi provinces. Baghdad, the capital with the largest population and sample contribution, showed the highest number of isolates (12/35, 34.3%). Other significant detection sites included Anbar Province (7/35, 20.0%), Salah ad-Din (3/35, 8.6%), and Sulaymaniyah (2/35, 5.7%). The remaining five isolates were distributed singly across Erbil, Duhok, Diyala, Wasit, Basrah, Qadisiyyah, and Kirkuk provinces. Notably, seven provinces (Babylon, Missan, Karbala, Muthanna, Najaf, Nineveh, and Thi-Qar) yielded no isolates, a pattern attributed to smaller sample sizes rather than true absence of circulation. This distribution underscores the necessity of nationwide surveillance infrastructure and highlights under-sampled populations in certain regions.

3.4 Comparative Analysis of Cytopathic Effects: OPV versus AFP-Associated Isolates

To establish comparative virulence phenotypes, original Sabin vaccine strains (Sabin PV-1, PV-3; obtained from the WHO Regional Reference Laboratory) and AFP-associated isolates from this study were cultivated in parallel on L20B cells at equivalent multiplicity of infection (MOI ≈ 0.1 TCID₅₀/cell) and matched passage numbers (passages 15–25). Digital microscopic documentation was obtained at 24-h intervals.

3.5 Original Sabin Vaccine Strain Characteristics

Original Sabin PV-1 (OPV-1) induced a characteristic pattern of incomplete monolayer destruction beginning at approximately 5–6 days post-inoculation. Early morphological changes consisted of cell rounding and localized detachment concentrated at discrete foci, surrounded by concentric zones of enlarged and rounded cells. These foci remained geographically isolated, with adjacent areas of intact monolayer clearly demarcated. At peak cytopathic effect (CPE grade +2 to +3), about 30–50% of the monolayer remained intact. Similar patterns were observed with Sabin PV-3, though with slightly delayed onset (6–7 days). Original vaccine strains showed a consistent phenotype characterized by gradual, spatially limited CPE progression.

3.6 AFP-Associated Isolate Characteristics

All AFP-associated Sabin isolates (PV-1, PV-3, and mixed populations) showed rapid, complete destruction of the monolayer. CPE onset occurred at 1–2 days post-inoculation, a 3- to 5-fold acceleration compared to vaccine strains. Infected cells exhibited pronounced nuclear pyknosis, cytoplasmic condensation, and rapid cell detachment. The CPE pattern was diffuse rather than focal, progressing in a wave-like manner toward complete monolayer lysis. Within 24–48 h of inoculation, all cells had undergone lysis and detachment (CPE grade +4). It was also observed that increased CPE occurred despite AFP isolates being at earlier passage numbers (15 vs. 25), indicating intrinsically greater cytolytic potential independent of passage-dependent attenuation or amplification.

Table 2. Cytopathic effects (CPE) of original Sabin PV-1 vaccine strain and AFP-associated PV-1 isolates on L20B cells. Key differences include markedly accelerated CPE onset, diffuse versus focal progression pattern, and complete versus partial monolayer destruction. Notably, AFP isolates demonstrated greater CPE despite being derived from earlier passages, indicating enhanced intrinsic cytolytic potential.

CPE Parameter Original OPV-1 AFP-Associated PV-1 Fold Difference
Time to CPE Onset 5–6 days 1–2 days 3–6 fold faster
CPE Pattern Focal/localized Diffuse/confluent N/A
Monolayer Involvement at Peak 30–50% 100% (complete lysis) 2–3 fold greater
CPE Grade at Peak +2 to +3 +4 N/A
Cell Morphology Focal rounding Rapid pyknosis & lysis N/A
Passage Number Tested 25 15 AFP at an earlier passage

3.7 Quantitative Viral Titer Analysis (TCID₅₀)

Viral titers were determined via serial dilution endpoint titration on L20B cells using the Reed-Muench method, expressed as log₁₀ TCID₅₀ per 0.1 mL, with duplicate determinations and confirmation by repeat measurements.

Original Sabin strains achieved maximum viral titers by passage 25. Sabin PV-1 achieved a log TCID₅₀ of 7.0, while Sabin PV-3 and mixed PV-1+3 populations achieved 6.25 and 6.6 log units, respectively. These represent baseline reference titers for attenuated vaccine strains.

Viral titers for the AFP-associated isolates are equal to or higher than the viral titers of the vaccine strains, even though the latter have been passaged significantly longer than the former. For example, the AFP-associated PV-1 at passage level 15 yielded a log TCID₅₀ of 7.4, while the OPV-1 at passage level 25 yielded 7.0 log TCID₅₀, representing an advantageous titer difference of 0.4 log units (2.5-fold) in favor of the PV-1 isolate compared to the OPV-1 isolate. Similarly, the AFP-associated PV-3 at passage level 15 produced a log TCID₅₀ of 6.4, whereas the original Sabin PV-3 at passage level 25 produced 6.25 log TCID₅₀. The mixed PV-1+3 populations cultured from the AFP cases exhibited 7.0 log TCID₅₀ at passage level 15, whereas the vaccine controls produced 6.6 log TCID₅₀ at passage level 25.

Table 3. Comparative viral titers of original Sabin vaccine strains and AFP-associated isolates. Titers were determined using the tissue culture infectious dose of 50% (TCID₅₀) in L20B cells with serial tenfold dilutions. AFP-associated isolates achieved equal or higher titers despite derivation from significantly earlier passage numbers (15 vs. 25), indicating enhanced replication efficiency. Values represent the mean of duplicate determinations, confirmed by repeat measurements.

Virus Population Source Log TCID₅₀ Passage No.
Sabin PV-1 Original vaccine 7.0 25
Sabin PV-3 Original vaccine 6.25 25
Mixed PV-1+3 Original vaccine 6.6 25
PV-1 (AFP-associated) This study 7.4 15
PV-3 (AFP-associated) This study 6.4 15
Mixed PV-1+3 (AFP) This study 7.0 15

3.8 Titer Kinetics and Replication Efficiency

The analysis of replication rates over time showed a major difference in how fast different viruses replicate and how well they can spread. The original Sabin strains of polio vaccine needed to be passed along 25 times before they could replicate to the level of 7.0–6.25 log units. On the other hand, AFP-associated isolates achieved the same or higher levels of replication by being passed just 15 times (a 10-step or 40% decrease). This means that, per passage, viruses associated with AFP replicate approximately 40% faster than vaccine strains. In natural settings with repeated cycles of fecal-oral transmission occurring over days or weeks, these faster replication rates would result in significantly greater amounts of virus found in both the intestines and the nervous system of infected people. This finding supports increased rates of developing infections and amplifying neurovirulent characteristics in immunocompromised individuals with prolonged periods of viral shedding.

4. Discussion

Based on our research, this is the first systematic comparative analysis of virulence phenotypes between original Sabin OPV strains and poliovirus isolates from children diagnosed with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) in Iraq. Our major findings indicate a significant change in virulence characteristics of Sabin-derived poliovirus circulating among AFP-affected children, as measured by cytopathic effect (CPE) assays and passage cycle replication efficiency. CPEs developed 3 to 5 times more quickly than expected after neutralization assay confirmation as Sabin strains. The maximum replication of poliovirus was increased 2.5 times compared to what was expected per each passage cycle among the polioviruses isolated from AFP-affected children. Therefore, the phenotypic changes described above in the Sabin-derived OPVs indicate genetic drift within the Sabin-derived genomes that resulted in reversion to some degree, but not to wild-type, through neutralization assays (i.e., no evidence of wild-type genomic sequence). Genetic drift in poliovirus genomes resulting in increased levels of virulence among Sabin-derived strains has been well described in individuals who are immunocompromised; however, our results are the first report of such drift occurring in community-based polio epidemiological surveillance of AFP cases and have important implications for the global strategy used to eradicate polio [25].

Sabin strain attenuation is due to well-known mutations located in four genomic regions: the 5′ UTR, the VP1 capsid protein, the 2C protease, and the 3D RNA-dependent RNA polymerase [26]. These four mutation types act synergistically to decrease neurovirulence by disrupting neural tissue replication and by reducing the fidelity of polymerase activity. However, Sabin attenuation has a probabilistic rather than absolute nature; thus, it is possible for Sabin strains to regain neurovirulence in immunocompromised patients [27]. In addition, recombination with other wild-type enteroviruses can also restore virulence to the Sabin strain via modular exchange of all or part of the genome [28].

Our findings suggest that isolates associated with AFP contain enough mutations to maintain the Sabin serotype since they are neutralized by serotype-specific antibodies, but in doing so, they have gradually restored replication kinetics and tropism characteristics similar to wild-type viruses. The increase in the rate of CPE accumulation and replication efficiency (approximately 40% reduction in the number of passages to reach maximum titer) are indicative of either loss of previous attenuating mutations or gain of compensatory mutations that have reversed the attenuation process [29]. The dissociation between serotype and neurovirulence is critical to understanding this phenomenon: serotype does not inherently indicate virulence, and traditional serotyping techniques cannot discern between virulent and non-infectious Sabin variants [30].

Global context underscores the urgency of these findings. The 2013–2015 Middle East polio outbreak, linked to Sabin-derived viruses in low-immunization communities, caused hundreds of AFP cases and demonstrated the pandemic potential of virulent Sabin variants [31,32]. The recent 2020–2023 emergence of vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 in multiple countries, with international transmission and significant paralytic disease, validates concerns regarding VDPV circulation in regions with vaccination coverage gaps [33].

The implications of these findings are urgent for polio eradication efforts in both the Eastern Mediterranean Region and worldwide. The emergence of virulent Sabin strains from community sources demonstrates that an OPV-based polio eradication strategy carries serious inherent risks in areas with immunization non-coverage and poor sanitation. Therefore, even though it is still necessary to use OPV to eradicate wild-type poliovirus where it continues to circulate, it is essential that countries without wild-type virus — such as Iraq — begin transitioning from OPV to inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) as soon as possible. IPV has several significant advantages over OPV: (1) it cannot replicate in the intestinal tract; (2) it cannot revert back to wild-type virulence; and (3) it cannot produce VDPVs. IPV will also provide adequate protection to individuals without any transmission risk to other individuals [34,35].

Another important consideration with transitioning to IPV is that it will need to be done in conjunction with robust epidemiologic surveillance efforts — both clinical (acute flaccid paralysis, AFP) and environmental (sewage sampling) — to monitor poliovirus circulation. In particular, for countries without adequate AFP surveillance, environmental surveillance will allow detection of circulating poliovirus in advance of any clinical cases by identifying the presence of poliovirus in control samples that indicate subclinical circulation. In addition, immunocompromised children should only receive IPV. Although some WHO guidelines are already in place on this matter, implementation remains very inconsistent between low- and middle-income countries due to a lack of IPV availability [35–37]. Iraq and Eastern Mediterranean Region countries should prioritize IPV access and establish protocols for identifying and managing immunocompromised children.

There must be agreements among countries with respect to coordinated regional action and data sharing. The 2013–2015 Middle East poliovirus outbreak demonstrated international transmission involving Iraq, Syria, and Palestine. All countries need to collaborate to develop coordinated vaccination and surveillance strategies. Countries such as Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and other conflict-affected countries should work towards developing mechanisms that will facilitate the rapid sharing of virology data and align vaccine policy decisions.

Limitations of this study include use of a limited set of WHO reference Sabin strains as comparators, reliance on phenotypic markers alone without full genomic sequencing to identify specific genetic determinants, and a sample size that cannot be generalized to the Middle East or to the world at large. Molecular serotyping will assist in determining if Sabin–wild-type recombinants are misclassified. The neurological status of controls was determined by parental reports alone; a formal neurological examination would also assist in identifying subjects with subclinical manifestations. Continuous surveillance will be needed for a comprehensive evaluation to occur.

5. Conclusion

The comparative data showed that Sabin strains of polioviruses from patients who had acute flaccid paralysis had a greater likelihood of producing virulence factors in vitro, as demonstrated by faster rates of developing cytopathic effect and by having higher overall viral titers per passage than any of the original vaccine strains. While the phenotypic change seen in these virus strains does not include any shifts in serotype, they are indicative of genetic drift through the reversion to an accelerated virulence phenotype via genetic mutations, thus providing molecular epidemiological evidence of higher neurovirulence potential. Moreover, the emergence of such strains exemplifies a fundamental tenet of public health; that is, live attenuated vaccines in an area with a low level of vaccination coverage and poor sanitation create an opportunity for the emergence of vaccine-derived disease. Although OPV has played an important role in the eradication of wild-type poliovirus in areas of high transmission, the epidemiology equation has changed in areas free of wild-type. Transitioning to IPV with appropriate immunologic monitoring and protocols to manage immunocompromised patients is a method to accomplish the sustained eradication of polio while eliminating the potential of iatrogenic disease. The results of this study furnish further evidence for the complete withdrawal of OPV from use and the universal introduction of IPV in the post-wild polio era, and further demonstrate the vital need for laboratory-based surveillance to provide an early detection system for the emergence of VDPV/VAPP.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff of all hospitals in Baghdad Governorate and the Department of Virology at the Central Public Health Laboratories for their assistance in collecting the clinical samples.

Funding Information

This work received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This review was approved by the Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq (114; 16-01-2016).

Author Contributions

Al-Garawi RHE: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Zgair AK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Resources, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

AI Declaration

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

6. References

  1. Hailu KT, Haddad RR. (2025) Structural Barriers and the Future of AI in Global Health: Lessons From Eradicable Diseases. Cureus 17(9):e92061. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92061. PMCID: PMC12514987
  2. Cooper LV, Bandyopadhyay AS, Gumede N, Mach O, Mkanda P, et al. (2022) Risk factors for the spread of vaccine-derived type 2 polioviruses after global withdrawal of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine and the effects of outbreak responses with monovalent vaccine: a retrospective analysis of surveillance data for 51 countries in Africa. Lancet Infect Dis 22(2):284–294. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00453-9. PMCID: PMC8799632
  3. Alfaro-Murillo JA, Ávila-Agüero ML, Fitzpatrick MC, Crystal CJ, Falleiros-Arlant LH, Galvani AP. (2020) The case for replacing live oral polio vaccine with inactivated vaccine in the Americas. Lancet 395(10230):1163–1166. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30213-0. PMCID: PMC8572547
  4. Oberste MS, Michele SM, Maher K, Schnurr D, Cisterna D, et al. (2004) Molecular identification and characterization of two proposed new enterovirus serotypes, EV74 and EV75. J Gen Virol 85(Pt 11):3205–3212. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80148-0. PMID: 15483233
  5. Xu J, Wang Q, Kuang S, Rong R, Zhang Y, et al. (2021) Immunogenicity of sequential poliovirus vaccination schedules with different strains of poliomyelitis vaccines in Chongqing, China: a cross-sectional survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 17(7):2125–2131. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1868269. PMCID: PMC8189127
  6. Burns CC, Diop OM, Sutter RW, Kew OM. (2014) Vaccine-derived polioviruses. J Infect Dis 210 Suppl 1:S283–S293. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu295. PMID: 25316847
  7. Belliot G, Sosnovtsev SV, Chang KO, McPhie P, Green KY. (2008) Nucleotidylylation of the VPg protein of a human norovirus by its proteinase-polymerase precursor protein. Virology 374(1):33–49. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.12.028. PMCID: PMC2386983
  8. Sun ZW, Fu Y, Lu HL, Yang RX, Goyal H, et al. (2021) Association of Rotavirus Vaccines With Reduction in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children Younger Than 5 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies. JAMA Pediatr 175(7):e210347. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0347
  9. Guo J, Bolivar-Wagers S, Srinivas N, Holubar M, Maldonado Y. (2015) Immunodeficiency-related vaccine-derived poliovirus (iVDPV) cases: a systematic review and implications for polio eradication. Vaccine 33(10):1235–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.018. PMCID: PMC5529169
  10. Anwar HB, Mazumder Y, Nujhat S, Islam BZ, Kalbarczyk A, et al. (2024) The evolution, facilitators, barriers, and additional activities of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance platform in polio eradication programme Bangladesh: a mixed-method study. Glob Health Action 17(1):2370096. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2370096. PMCID: PMC11212555
  11. Duintjer Tebbens RJ, Pallansch MA, Kim JH, Burns CC, Kew OM, et al. (2013) Oral poliovirus vaccine evolution and insights relevant to modeling the risks of circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs). Risk Anal 33(4):680–702. doi: 10.1111/risa.12022. PMCID: PMC7890645
  12. Khetsuriani N, Lamonte A, Oberste MS, Pallansch M. (2006) Neonatal enterovirus infections reported to the national enterovirus surveillance system in the United States, 1983–2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 25(10):889–93. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000237798.07462.32. PMID: 17006282
  13. Shakaryan AK, Mikhailova YM, Chirova AV, Cherepanova EA, Baikova OY, et al. (2025) Acute Flaccid Paralysis in a Vaccinated Child With Primary Immunodeficiency: Difficulties With Diagnostics of Vaccine-Associated Paralytic Poliomyelitis. J Med Virol 97(12):e70704. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70704. PMID: 41288257
  14. Wolfe ND, Dunavan CP, Diamond J. (2007) Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature 447(7142):279–283. doi: 10.1038/nature05775
  15. Aldakheel FM, Abrar A, Munir S, Aslam S, Allemailem KS, et al. (2021) Proteome-Wide Mapping and Reverse Vaccinology Approaches to Design a Multi-Epitope Vaccine against Clostridium perfringens. Vaccines 9(10):1079. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101079. PMCID: PMC8539331
  16. Wang L, Han W, Li D, Wang S, Jiang Z, et al. (2025) Immunogenicity and safety of sequential Sabin strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine from different manufacturers in infants: Randomized, blinded, controlled trial. Vaccine 61:127448. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127448. PMID: 40614614
  17. Gemechu H, Biru G, Gebremeskel E, Daba Nemomssa H, Dese K, et al. (2025) A review on health system-based surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis: technological advancements, challenges, and outlooks. J Health Popul Nutr 44(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01115-7. PMCID: PMC12613547
  18. Yu X, Cheng G. (2022) Contribution of phylogenetics to understanding the evolution and epidemiology of dengue virus. Animal Model Exp Med 5(5):410–417. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12283. PMCID: PMC9610151
  19. Manukyan H, Zagorodnyaya T, Ruttimann R, Manor Y, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. (2018) Quantitative multiplex one-step RT-PCR assay for identification and quantitation of Sabin strains of poliovirus in clinical and environmental specimens. J Virol Methods 259:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.06.009. PMID: 29920299
  20. Jartti M, Flodström-Tullberg M, Hankaniemi MM. (2024) Enteroviruses: epidemic potential, challenges and opportunities with vaccines. J Biomed Sci 31(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12929-024-01058-x. PMCID: PMC11247760
  21. Thorley BR, Roberts JA. (2016) Isolation and characterization of poliovirus in cell culture systems. In Poliovirus: Methods and Protocols (pp. 29–53). New York, NY: Springer New York.
  22. Ciapponi A, Bardach A, Rey Ares L, Glujovsky D, Cafferata ML, et al. (2019) Sequential inactivated (IPV) and live oral (OPV) poliovirus vaccines for preventing poliomyelitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12(12):CD011260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011260.pub2. PMCID: PMC6953375
  23. Khetsuriani N, Perehinets I, Nitzan D, Popovic D, Moran T, et al. (2017) Responding to a cVDPV1 outbreak in Ukraine: Implications, challenges and opportunities. Vaccine 35(36):4769–4776. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.036. PMCID: PMC10465089
  24. Zaidi SS, Asghar H, Sharif S, Alam MM. (2016) Poliovirus Laboratory Based Surveillance: An Overview. Methods Mol Biol 1387:11–18. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3292-4_2. PMID: 26983728
  25. Biru G, Gemechu H, Gebremeskel E, Nemomssa HD, Dese K, et al. (2025) Community-Based Surveillance of Acute Flaccid Paralysis: A Review on Detection and Reporting Strategy. J Epidemiol Glob Health 15(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s44197-025-00349-2. PMCID: PMC11842678
  26. Li C, Han W, Zhang Y, Wang J. (2007) A Sabin 1 poliovirus-based vaccine vector transfects Vero cells with high efficiency. Cytotechnology 54(3):169–179. doi: 10.1007/s10616-007-9085-0. PMCID: PMC2267503
  27. Famulare M, Chang S, Iber J, Zhao K, Adeniji JA, et al. (2015) Sabin Vaccine Reversion in the Field: a Comprehensive Analysis of Sabin-Like Poliovirus Isolates in Nigeria. J Virol 90(1):317–331. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01532-15. PMCID: PMC4702576
  28. Fernandez-Garcia MD, Faye M, Diez-Fuertes F, Moreno-Docón A, Chirlaque-López MD, et al. (2023) Metagenomic sequencing, molecular characterization, and Bayesian phylogenetics of imported type 2 vaccine-derived poliovirus, Spain, 2021. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13:1168355. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1168355. PMCID: PMC10185892
  29. Mohanty MC, Mohammad A, Verma H, Kumar A, Madkaikar MR, et al. (2023) Poliovirus surveillance in patients with primary immunodeficiencies, India. Bull World Health Organ 101(5):346–354. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.289066. PMCID: PMC10140681
  30. Famulare M, Chang S, Iber J, Zhao K, Adeniji JA, et al. (2015) Sabin Vaccine Reversion in the Field: a Comprehensive Analysis of Sabin-Like Poliovirus Isolates in Nigeria. J Virol 90(1):317–331. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01532-15. PMCID: PMC4702576
  31. Han T, Xiao J, Zhang S, Su T, Liu Y, Zhang Y. (2026) Research Progress Towards Poliovirus Virus-like Particle Vaccines: A Review. Vaccines 14(3):216. doi: 10.3390/vaccines14030216. PMCID: PMC13030300
  32. Mbaeyi C, Ryan MJ, Smith P, Mahamud A, Farag N, et al. (2017) Response to a Large Polio Outbreak in a Setting of Conflict — Middle East, 2013–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66(8):227–231. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a6. PMCID: PMC5657899
  33. Mohanty A, Rohilla R, Zaman K, Hada V, Dhakal S, et al. (2023) Vaccine Derived Poliovirus (VDPV). Infez Med 31(2):174–185. doi: 10.53854/liim-3102-5. PMCID: PMC10241397
  34. Estivariz CF, Krow-Lucal ER, Mach O. (2024) Immunodeficiency-Related Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus (iVDPV) Infections: A Review of Epidemiology and Progress in Detection and Management. Pathogens 13(12):1128. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13121128. PMCID: PMC11677883
  35. Tsegaye AA, Suptela AJ, Marriott I, Trammell SR. (2026) Light-assisted drying enables vaccine stabilization and supports cold-chain-independent distribution. Sci Rep 16(1):11104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-40775-1. PMCID: PMC13043887
  36. Duintjer Tebbens RJ, Zimmermann M, Pallansch MA, Thompson KM. (2017) Insights from a Systematic Search for Information on Designs, Costs, and Effectiveness of Poliovirus Environmental Surveillance Systems. Food Environ Virol 9(4):361–382. doi: 10.1007/s12560-017-9314-4. PMCID: PMC7879701
  37. Romero-Martínez A, Lila M, Vitoria-Estruch & Moya-Albiol L. (2014) Mini review: psychosocial stress such as violence against their partners could benefit general immunity in intimate partner violence perpetrators. Int J Emerg Ment Health 16(2):346–349. PMID: 25585489

Author Affiliation

  1. Department of Virology, Central Public Health Laboratories, Baghdad, Iraq.
  2. Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, 10071, Iraq.

ORCID IDs:
Al-Garawi RHE: orcid.org/0009-0001-6685-9534
Zgair AK: orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-3338

* Correspondence:
Dr. Ayaid Khadem Zgair. E-mail: ayaid.zgair@sc.uobaghdad.edu.iq
Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, 10071, Iraq.